Editorial

28 Jul 2016 Corina Pelloni

TIGHT SHIRTS

Here we go again! During the year’s British Open telecast, Johnny Miller, working his first ever Open, spouted out commentary which once again leaves some raising their eyebrows, while others cheer his candor. Some players despise his brutal honestly, some choose to ignore and laugh, while viewers/listeners are offered the option of tuning out or debating his hypotheses. I fall in the latter. There’s nothing like a good debate. His latest views were directed toward Rory McIlroy’s skin-tight wardrobe’s ability to espouse the benefits of his workout routine, to which we’re all somewhat privy via various social media forums. His comments as follows: “Golf is a game of finesse and touch that requires a certain amount of strength, and Rory has a little too much of the latter.” “I think he overdid the weight room, personally. I don’t think that helped him at all. I think the same thing with Tiger Woods. You just get carried away with wearing the tight shirts and showing off their sort of muscles.” Okay! Where do I start? We could put Johnny’s comments into context. He’s on live television and there is no script, with the possibility he didn’t think every word through the way a speechwriter preparing a presidential state of the union address would. Johnny Miller is the Donald Trump of television commentators: shoots from the “lip” and sticks to his beliefs, all the while remaining immune to the fallout, if any. Miller is hired for his knowledge of the game and to provide cringe-worthy opinion at times. However, and like Trump, every once in a while he’ll say something people may be thinking but don’t want to verbalize, not always based on fact but opinion and half-truths. This, of course is my opinion, and you the reader are entitled to agree to disagree. I digress. Where is the truth or the facts in Johnny’s statements? We could start with: –    “Too much strength.” Relatively easy to surmise Johnny didn’t think that one through, but again, it was live television. Nothing wrong with strength…with strength comes stability and speed –     “Golf is a game of finesse and touch that requires a certain amount of strength.” Hard to argue with that statement. –     “I think he overdid the weight room, personally. I don’t think that helped him at all. I think the same thing with Tiger Woods.” This is the most debatable quote. I’m a big believer in stats, as stats seldom lie if the data is accumulated effectively over an extended period of time. If we look back over Tiger’s career, he led in many statistical categories, with putting and greens in regulation (GIR) being his forte. His average driving distance fell off slightly in terms of ranking as he was always in the top three early in his career. Could this be attributed to his added bulk (muscle) in his torso and biceps? Perhaps, but we’ll never really know, as this was the era of modern equipment changes, so making the comparison proves difficult. We can go on Tiger’s own words in that he gained strength but lost explosive speed from when he was younger. Is it fair to say this is occurring with Rory? If we compare this year to 2014 and a couple of previous years, he has lost distance and ranking in this category. It is known that muscle is heavier; hence, moving a heavy weight as fast as a lighter weight is not so easy. Rory may be strong, but perhaps he’s lost or in the process of losing speed due to his increased bulk, blatantly visible in his upper arms and chest area. Tiger was not the first professional golfer known for introducing weights and fitness training into golf. As we’re all aware, his predecessor Gary Player owns this title, but of course, Tiger’s superstar status and results forced others to take notice and step up their respective regimens. No doubt every male professional golfer in the world who is capable of earning a good living at the game believes he has the best team of coaches, trainers, etc., providing them with all the tools and expertise to play their best. Miller believes, along with other golf pundits, Rory and fellow “gym rats” adding bulk are doing themselves and their games a disservice. The belief stems from the fact we have never witnessed great champions in the past built like football linebackers, and for good reason. They also believe such practices are putting themselves at risk for injury. We may never know or find out for sure why Tiger Woods at 40 years old has been plagued with serious back issues. Are they from lifting heavy weights, or purported injuries suffered while training with Navy Seals? One thing we do know is none other than Ben Hogan hit more balls than anyone, except for perhaps Moe Norman, and never suffered an injury related to golf. His body was lean, flexible and wiry-strong. Was he blessed with these physical attributes? Most definitely. However, Tiger was, as well. Rory, too, has been blessed with great flexibility and explosive speed. Starting a few years ago, he developed his body in the gym to withstand the rigors of professional golf. The question about Rory overdoing it in the gym now needs to be asked, and this truly was the point of what some claim to be Johnny Miller’s controversial statements. I think the jury can remain out on this one regarding injury. Only time will tell, because some are more prone to hereditary injuries than others. However, he has lost explosive speed compared to 2014. He has also fallen in two important statistical categories in which Tiger never suffered: putting and greens in regulation. Perhaps a little less time in the gym would curtail this trend.

21 Jul 2016 Corina Pelloni

HONOR

Many discussions have been held regarding Dustin Johnson’s ball moving during the final round of the U.S. Open and the resulting ruling.  For those who might not remember the scenario, Dustin was on the green early in his round and prior to addressing the ball, the ball rolled backwards about a one-half of an inch.  D.J. called the walking rules official over and informed him of what happened.  The official said there was no penalty and they moved on.  A few holes later, a few officials came back onto the course to let D.J. know there was a rules violation and that they would visit after the round. Golf differs from other games in many ways.  One of the major differences is that the golfers will call rules infractions on themselves.  This doesn’t happen in any other sport.  You would never see a basketball player call a timeout to tell the official that he fouled another player.  Could you imagine a football game in which an offensive lineman would tell the referee that he held a defensive player?  Golf is an anomaly in that regards; we call penalties on ourselves.  Always have and always will, because it is a game based on the honor system.  I’m not saying that other sports don’t have honor associated with their game, but that they have a (sometimes) neutral third party calling infractions. When the USGA official asked Dustin if he made the ball move and D.J. said he didn’t, it should have been the end of the story.  Period.  There was no visible proof that he made the ball move; now the USGA officials are questioning D.J.’s honor and integrity.  In my opinion, the USGA tried to make themselves the focal point of the tournament versus the actual tournament itself. As golf teaching professionals, we lead by example for our students and members.  We play with honor and integrity.  I’m very honored to be part of a wonderful organization like the USGTF and WGTF.  Happy teaching!

12 Jul 2016 Corina Pelloni

WHO JUDGES THE GUARDIANS?

To say I am disappointed in the USGA would be an understatement. The Dustin Johnson decision is just the culmination of several abuses of power I feel have originated from the body in recent years. Sometimes, when organizations get so wrapped up in their so-called authority, they can easily lose perspective. I saw this happen often when I worked in the corporate world. A company or facility would become so enthralled with being recognized as experts in the field that they just brushed aside any new ideas as not worthy of recognition. They just felt they knew best, and if you didn’t like it, too bad. When it comes to golf, rules are important, but they should be cut-and-dried. Play the ball as it lies…out of bounds…stoke and distance. It is also recognized that players are responsible for adhering to the rules and calling penalties on themselves. Johnson called the official over as soon as he saw that the ball changed position. That shows that he was being responsible to the game. When asked if he felt it moved as a result of his action, he did not believe it to be the case. His playing partner agreed. The official took his word, and that should have been the end of it. The higher-ups at the USGA wouldn’t let it go. They felt that since Dustin did not know what actually caused the ball to move, it must have been him. Even watching it in slow motion, there was no clear evidence that Johnson caused the ball to move. But like the IRS, guilty, because we say so. Did you ever go to the driving range and place a ball down on a nice area of grass, only to have it move at the top of your backswing? Happens frequently. Sometimes, things happen for no reason other than mere chance. I’m sure that if Johnson thought he had caused the ball to move, he would have said so and accepted the penalty. It should never have gone any further than that. The USGA motto is for the “good of the game.” In my opinion, I don’t see much of that lately with these folks.

16 Jun 2016 Corina Pelloni

MATCH PLAY

Last week I was watching the NCAA Men’s Championship on TV.  The tournament format is match play:  first team to three wins is the champion.  This style of play is always entertaining because of the ups and downs of the match.  One player is leading by a few holes, and then the other player makes a comeback.  It’s real-life golf drama. I noticed that I was becoming more and more engaged in the matches, cheering on the great shots and the players’ recovery shots.  There were a number of times a player seemed to be out of the hole; one player had an advantage by hitting a good shot to set up a birdie effort, and the other player, who seemed to be out of position, would either make a long putt or even chip-in from off the green.  This now forces the player in good position to make his putt to just tie the hole. Most golfers don’t play a lot of match play.  We often grind trying to shoot the lowest score possible.  When teaching our students, especially the younger ones, it is important we talk about these “must-make” opportunities.  Lead them in drills or games that get them in the right frame of mind to be aggressive on making the shot.  You can see that some players thrive in these environments while others don’t. Playing match play will teach your students the importance of never giving up, as well as providing the opportunity to experience a “flair” for the dramatic.  Your students will be more successful, and you will be, too.

14 Jun 2016 Corina Pelloni

VISIONS OF A GREAT TEACHER

Golf is not a game alone, but a means of developing people, pleasant people with good attitude and strong character.  Coaches and partners are committed to shifting the culture of golf from tips, formulas and answers, to one of exploration, discovery and freedom. As a teacher and coach, it is important in recognizing what is his/her ability, and re-defining what is possible for him/her in learning this game.  We must also teach how to learn and how to integrate on the course.  Learn how to access concentration and how to practice productivity, and also discover how to self-coach in areas of specific interest. As teachers of the game, our commitment is to empower our student to step into the heart and soul of the game, and to use it to access new possibilities such as the real joy and adventure of learning, inspiring high-performance golfers.  Golfers should have a coaching influence and a support team that is focused on facilitating skills development and personal growth.

9 Jun 2016 Corina Pelloni

THE POWER OF OBSERVATION

Technology abounds. Every golfer wants it and many teachers love using it. Be it video, 3-D motion capture, launch monitors, foot-pressure pads, rangefinders, or the latest and greatest golf club technology, the world of golf has become obsessed with technology and its perceived ability to improve one’s game. There is no doubt there are some great tools out there to assist us in our teaching, along with giving us the reputation amongst our clients as being at the cutting edge of the instruction industry. We should all remember they are present to assist and not replace the human factor of observation. As instructors, we must first and foremost begin with observation and prioritize what we see. How often are we doing this in every lesson? I can personally go on about stories of students who have received lessons where the teaching professional never looked up from his computer, but I regress. So, where do we start? Students of different levels have different needs. A novice must learn basic components of setup, pivot, arm and club motion before a golf ball enters the picture, which may take some time…many lessons, in some cases. Our ability to observe without fail rather than going through the motions at this stage of a golfer’s evolution cannot be overstated. The lower hand on the club, as one example, can and more likely will lead to an incorrect clubface position and wrist hinge, causing further compensations throughout the motion. The reason the novice is in our hands is so such a problem doesn’t occur; otherwise, he or she may just as well take lessons from their over-qualified 27-handicap best friend. For the experienced player, ball flight comes first. Always! Ball flight is everything, because it offers the player feedback. Again, our job is to relate ball flight to motion tendencies. In other words, what is the club doing to create a particular ball flight? What is our body doing to make the club move in one fashion or another? This is our responsibility, and the observation facet relies on ball flight and our knowledge of what is occurring with the club and body as pertaining to every ball flight possibility. There aren’t many:

• Initial Direction – Clubface direction at impact (85% responsible)
• Curvature – Path as it relates to clubface
• Trajectory – Angle of attack (steepness of pitch) and  vertical centeredness of strike
• Distance – Speed of clubhead, centeredness of strike

As golf instructors, the aforementioned ball flight laws are our commandments, our constitutional amendments, or any term of our desire, but without fail they take priority over everything, including technology.

8 Jun 2016 Corina Pelloni

GOLF – THE GAME OF LOST FAVORITES

I used to know the golf tour stops. There was Riviera, the Crosby and Hope, Doral, Harbour Town and Greater Greensboro. Now there is the Frys.com, Valspar, Quicken Loans and the Dean & Deluca, not to mention all the other corporate-sponsored events that seem to change every couple of years. I have been involved with the tournament in Tampa for some time. It started as the JC Penny Classic. Since then it has been named the Buick, Chrysler, Pods, Transitions, EverBank and Valspar. A game steeped in tradition has abandoned the moniker for cash. I guess it was inevitable; it takes a lot of green to conduct a tournament, what with million-dollar payouts and infrastructure to attract fans and sponsors. Still, to name Hogan’s alley at Colonial the Dean & Deluca Championship sickens me. At least we still have the Arnold Palmer Invitational and the Memorial at Jack’s place in Ohio. But don’t you think that when these two pass on to that beautiful fairway in the sky that several companies won’t be beating down the door to get their name on the events. It’s a shame. Growing up, I knew all the great players of yesteryear. Their names were on golf clubs or attached to tournaments in remembrance of their heroics. I started off in golf with a Sam Snead 7-iron. My dad gave me three Gene Littler woods. I even had a Gene Sarazen 3-iron with a wooden shaft. Sometimes when I am teaching, I’ll mention a famous golfer from the past, and my young students will look at me with a blank stare. Sign of the times, I guess. I understand it, but I don’t have to like it.